Timbuktu Institute 

Download the report

Throughout September, events across West and Central Africa highlighted the mounting pressures confronting political and security institutions, as well as the varied responses of states seeking to contain them. In the central Sahel, major attacks against Malian military positions and the reorganization of Niger's military leadership following the late-August mutiny raised renewed questions about military effectiveness, cohesion, and the role of external security partners. These challenges unfolded against a broader regional security environment in which neighboring states, including Senegal, Benin, and Nigeria, continued to strengthen their responses to threats emanating from or developing along the Sahelian borderlands.

On the political front, institutional arrangements governing competition and participation remained contested in several countries. Restrictions affecting opposition parties in Guinea-Bissau, administrative pressures on political organizations in Cameroon, and disputes over electoral institutions in Côte d'Ivoire illustrated different ways in which political competition can become constrained. Meanwhile, in Senegal and The Gambia, economic pressures and public grievances increasingly intersected with political competition. These developments also underscored an important distinction: public mobilization, parliamentary scrutiny, and opposition activity can strengthen institutional accountability when political systems provide credible avenues for expressing and addressing grievances.

At the regional level, political divisions persisted alongside efforts to maintain practical cooperation. The Alliance of Sahel States (AES) pursued further diplomatic and institutional coordination, while neighboring governments sought ways to manage shared security challenges despite unresolved tensions. Algeria's renewed engagement with Mali also illustrated the continuing strategic importance of relationships extending beyond the AES itself. Taken together, the region's fragility appears to depend not only on the pressures confronting states and societies, but also on whether the responses adopted by governments and regional institutions alleviate existing vulnerabilities or create new ones.